Monday, January 30, 2012
I Didn't Watch It But...
The economy is stimulated by people spending money. That means people have to have money to spend. Now, I'm not going to lie, I didn't watch President Obama's State of the Union address, but I did read this article outlining his main economic policies for the upcoming year. I'm no expert on politics, but I do notice that the majority of the time, what a President says in the State of the Union address is all talk, no matter whose party they're throwing. But Obama did say some pretty interesting stuff about stimulating our economy. What it looks like to me is that he is all about Congress spending money to make jobs to decrease the unemployment rate. And where does Congress get this money? According to President Obama, its going to come from taxing the rich. Taking money away from the rich also takes away their spending money, so they stop spending money consuming and investing in business, which takes away money from businesses that they could use to create jobs and hire people. So in the end, this plan doesn't really work, because government created jobs aren't really jobs at all. For an economy to work, the people need to have a little bit of freedom and power to make and spend money as they see fit. With everyone "playing by the same rules", it's hard for people to do that. It ends up being a redistribution of wealth which is the complete opposite of the country's capitalistic foundation. In fact, it's socialism (ooohhh scary word). In my opinion, we should be looking for ways to stimulate the economy without additional government spending and taking money out of the public's hands. How? (ask Ron Paul)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
The idea of taxing the rich is justified (by those for it) because they can afford the hit in their income?
Scott, you were absolutely spot-on with this blog post. The idea of taxing the rich is reasonable, because not only should the Federal Government tax the rich, they should also tax everybody else! But when a person has over 30% of their income taken out to go to government spending, they are most likely going to be stingy with the rest of their money. By making the rich "do their fair share" is unmistakably socialistic, and not surprising to hear from the worst administration in American history.
Post a Comment